NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X
What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon R9 M390X. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Benchmarks
| 3661 | 3DMark Time Spy | 2370 |
| 8137 | 3DMark Fire Strike | 6359 |
| 1854 | 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra | 1693 |
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| TU117 | GPU Name | Amethyst |
| TU117-300-A1 | Model number | Amethyst XT |
| Turing | Architecture | GCN 3.0 |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 28 nm |
| 4,700 million | Transistors | 5,000 million |
| 200 mm² | Die Size | 366 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | May 5th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 | Family | Crystal System (R9 M300) |
| Active | Production | Active |
| GeForce 10 | Predecessor | Solar System |
| PCIe 3.0 x16 | Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128 bit | Memory Bus | 256 bit |
| 128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s |
Performance
| 53.28 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 23.14 GPixel/s |
| 93.24 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 92.54 GTexel/s |
| 5.967 TFLOPS (2:1) | FP16 (half) performance | 2.961 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| 2.984 TFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| 93.24 GFLOPS (1:32) | FP64 (double) performance | 185.1 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Clock Speeds
| 2001 MHz 8 Gbps effective | Memory Clock | 1250 MHz 5 Gbps effective |
Render Config
| 896 | Shading Units | 2048 |
| 56 | TMUs | 128 |
| 32 | ROPs | 32 |
| 64 KB (per SM) | L1 Cache | 16 KB (per CU) |
| 1024 KB | L2 Cache | 512 KB |
Board Design
| Dual-slot | Slot Width | MXM Module |
| 75 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 75 W |
| 1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x DisplayPort | Display Connectors | No outputs |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
| PG174 SKU 0 | Board Number | C608 |
API support
| 12 (12_1) | DirectX | 12 (12_0) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 3.0 | OpenCL | 2.0 |
| 1.2 | Vulkan | 1.2 |
| 6.6 | Shader Model | 6.3 |