AMD Radeon E8950 vs AMD Zhongshan Subor Z+ GPU
What is the difference between AMD Radeon E8950 and AMD Zhongshan Subor Z+ GPU. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| Amethyst | GPU Name | Fenghuang |
| E8950 | Model number | Zhongshan Subor |
| GCN 3.0 | Architecture | GCN 5.0 |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 28 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 5,000 million | Transistors | unknown |
| 366 mm² | Die Size | 397 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Sep 29th, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2018 |
| Embedded (8000) | Family | Console GPU (Zhongshan Subor) |
| Active | Production | Active |
Memory
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256 bit | Memory Bus | 256 bit |
| 192.0 GB/s | Bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s |
Performance
| 32.00 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 41.60 GPixel/s |
| 128.0 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 124.8 GTexel/s |
| 4.096 TFLOPS (1:1) | FP16 (half) performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| 4.096 TFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 3.994 TFLOPS |
| 256.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | FP64 (double) performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Clock Speeds
| 1500 MHz 6 Gbps effective | Memory Clock | 1200 MHz 4.8 Gbps effective |
Render Config
| 2048 | Shading Units | 1536 |
| 128 | TMUs | 96 |
| 32 | ROPs | 32 |
| 32 | Compute Units | 24 |
Board Design
| 95 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 100 W |
| No outputs | Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
| 12 (12_0) | DirectX | 12 (12_1) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 2.0 | OpenCL | 2.1 |
| 1.2 | Vulkan | 1.2 |
| 6.3 | Shader Model | 6.2 |