NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M and NVIDIA Tesla C2090. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| G92 | GPU Name | GF110 |
| Tesla | Architecture | Fermi 2.0 |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 40 nm |
| 754 million | Transistors | 3,000 million |
| 324 mm² | Die Size | 520 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Aug 14th, 2008 | Release Date | Jul 25th, 2011 |
| Quadro FX Mobile (x800M) | Family | Tesla (x20xx) |
| End-of-life | Production | End-of-life |
| MXM-B (3.0) | Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory
| 1024 MB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256 bit | Memory Bus | 384 bit |
| 64.00 GB/s | Bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s |
Performance
| 10.80 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 20.83 GPixel/s |
| 43.20 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 41.66 GTexel/s |
| 422.4 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 1,332 GFLOPS |
Clock Speeds
| 1000 MHz 2 Gbps effective | Memory Clock | 924 MHz 3.7 Gbps effective |
| 675 MHz | GPU Clock | 651 MHz |
Render Config
| 128 | Shading Units | 512 |
| 64 | TMUs | 64 |
| 16 | ROPs | 48 |
| 64 KB | L2 Cache | 768 KB |
| 16 | SM Count | 16 |
Board Design
| MXM Module | Slot Width | Dual-slot |
| 100 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 250 W |
| No outputs | Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
| 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX | 12 (11_0) |
| 3.3 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 1.1 | OpenCL | 1.1 |
| N/A | Vulkan | N/A |
| 4.0 | Shader Model | 5.1 |
| 1.1 | CUDA | 2.0 |